MarineLearn, home
Close view of hands connecting components on a workbench, one holding a multimeter probe.
Photo: Zeal Creative Studios / Pexels

Quality and assurance

The part you should actually check.

Anyone can describe a course. What separates a training provider from a presenter is whether the assessment is valid, the certificate is controlled, the trainer was verified, the records are traceable, and someone is accountable for each of those. Here is ours.

01 / Quality objectives

What the system is for.

  • Consistent delivery

    Deliver approved content and contact hours consistently.

  • Competent trainers

    Maintain competent trainers and reliable assessment decisions.

  • Measurable improvement

    Achieve measurable improvement between baseline and final assessment.

  • Responsiveness

    Respond to learner and employer feedback within defined timelines.

  • Currency and control

    Keep course content current and control all revisions.

  • Record integrity

    Maintain complete, accurate and secure training records.

02 / Assessment

Four assessment points, each with its purpose.

Assessment is valid, reliable, fair, transparent and proportionate to the stated outcomes. Every course carries an assessment plan identifying the purpose, method, timing, pass requirements, reassessment arrangements, and the person responsible for marking and moderation.

The assessment framework, from the institutional training profile.
Assessment pointPurposeIllustrative evidence
Pre-courseEstablish baseline knowledge and tailor emphasis.Diagnostic test or self-assessment
FormativeProvide feedback during learning.Exercises, questions, drafts, calculations
SummativeDetermine whether exit outcomes are achieved.Test, assignment, project or observed simulation
Post-courseEvaluate confidence, application and organisational benefit.Evaluation, action plan, follow-up survey

03 / Certification and records

How a certificate is controlled.

  • Issued only on verification

    Certificates are issued only after verification of identity, attendance, assessment outcome and any other approved completion conditions.

  • Serialised and accurate

    Each certificate bears a unique serial number and accurate course particulars.

  • Authorised issue

    An authorised officer signs off before issue, and the issue is recorded in a certificate register.

  • Appeals

    Learners receive a documented route for raising a complaint or appealing an assessment decision. Appeals are reviewed by a person not responsible for the original decision, where practicable.

  • Academic integrity

    Plagiarism, impersonation, unauthorised collaboration and falsification are addressed under an academic-integrity procedure, with proportionate sanctions and a right to respond.

  • Learner records

    Learner files are complete, traceable and held securely, and record integrity is itself one of the measured indicators.

04 / Governance

Who is accountable for what.

Responsibility for institutional oversight, academic quality, delivery and records management is allocated to named roles, each with the evidence required to demonstrate it.

Governance roles and evidence of accountability, from the institutional training profile.
RoleCore accountabilityEvidence
Board and DirectorsStrategic oversight, legal compliance and resource approval.Company records, governance resolution
PrincipalInstitutional leadership and accountability for regulatory compliance.Appointment letter, CV
Head of TrainingCurriculum approval, trainer deployment, delivery quality and learner results.Job description, qualifications
Quality Assurance LeadAudits, evaluation, corrective action and document control.Appointment, QA records
Programme Lead and TrainerTechnical delivery, assessment and learner support.CV, certificates, experience, trainer registration where applicable
Administrator and Records OfficerAdmissions, registers, communication, certification and secure records.Job description, records procedures

05 / Trainers

How a trainer is approved.

  • Matched to the subject

    Trainers are deployed whose academic or professional qualifications, occupational experience and training competence are appropriate to the assigned subject.

  • Verified, not asserted

    Verification includes identity, certified qualifications and professional standing where relevant. A trainer file is held and reviewed.

  • Observed

    Trainers are observed, at least periodically and always for new trainers, with an observation report and any resulting action recorded.

06 / Quality controls

Eight recurring controls, with an owner and an output.

Quality-assurance controls and responsibilities, from the institutional training profile.
ControlFrequencyResponsible roleOutput
Course readiness reviewBefore each cohortHead of TrainingSigned readiness checklist
Trainer observationPeriodically, and for new trainersAcademic and QA LeadObservation report and action
Assessment moderationEach assessed cohort, or risk-based sampleIndependent competent reviewerModeration record
Learner evaluationEach cohortTrainer and AdministratorEvaluation summary
Course performance reviewAfter each cohortProgramme LeadCourse report
Curriculum reviewAt least annually, or on material changeAcademic panelVersion-controlled approval
Internal compliance auditAt least annuallyQA LeadAudit and corrective-action log
Management reviewAt least annuallyPrincipal and DirectorsManagement-review minutes

What we measure

Completion rate
Percentage of enrolled learners meeting attendance and completion requirements.
Learning gain
Average change between baseline and final assessment.
Assessment success
Percentage achieving the approved pass standard.
Learner satisfaction
Average rating and qualitative feedback.
Employer application
Reported workplace use of learning after an agreed follow-up period.
Corrective-action closure
Percentage closed within the assigned due date.
Trainer currency
Percentage of active trainer files complete and reviewed annually.
Record integrity
Percentage of sampled learner files complete and traceable.

Targets against each indicator are approved per programme before delivery, alongside the course outline and the assessment plan, rather than set once and applied to every cohort regardless of what it is. We would rather publish the measure and agree the target with you than print a number we cannot stand behind.

Auditing us before you contract us?

The full quality system, the controlled forms and registers, facilitator CVs and the complete institutional training profile are supplied with any tender, prequalification or sole-source submission, and on request.

A conversation about training

Tell us what your people need to be able to do.

What would be most useful?
How many people?

Four questions. No newsletter, and we do not pass your details on.